Or so goes the defence.
There's no need to dissect all of the desperate Harper potshots, because I've got limited band width. However, a few obvious points should be made:
1) When one tries to wrap themselves in virgin maple leaf cloth, one should not have danced with the je accused devil; he should not have mused indifferently about whether Canada ends up with one, two or ten national governments; and he should call on Howie Meeker to 'check that tape' before making foolish remarks.
2) While framed as an irreparable disagreement between political parties, with a looming financial crisis hanging over its head, the general public is neither eager to embrace either Harper nor a strange awkward coalition of flower-bearers.
3) Throwing good money after bad to save the political life of Gummo Harper may seem like a good investment, but why should tax payers be subsidizing it - especially if their argument is that tax payers should not be subsidizing the party that they vote for?
4) When the CONservatives come to their senses and realize that they need a completely different, more relaxed and low-key point person, will this man want the job?
5) Is Harper just P-O'd that he's become Duceppe's 'sloppy seconds'?
3 comments:
"4) When the CONservatives come to their senses and realize that they need a completely different, more relaxed and low-key point person, will this man want the job?"
Who's the man in the pic you linked too? I recognize him but can't remember his name.
That's the Toronto Maple Leafs' latest savior Brian Burke. Having witnessed his hot-headed, bombastic nature here in Vancouver, I was being tongue in cheek; it's my thin sports humour creeping in.
Thanks. :)
Post a Comment